Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks on the phone at the 18th green during day three of the LIV Golf Invitational – Miami at Trump National Doral Miami on April 07, 2024 in Doral, Florida.
Megan Briggs | Getty Images
Attorneys for Donald Trump on Monday filed a last-ditch appeal to change the venue of his upcoming criminal hush money trial and pause a gag order barring him from speaking about likely witnesses or the judge’s family.
The bid to a New York appeals court came one week before jury selection is set to begin in the Manhattan Supreme Court trial, where Trump is charged with falsifying business records to conceal a payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.
The appeal was filed using a legal mechanism that allows a person to directly challenge a court’s actions, a source with direct knowledge told NBC News. Doing so allows Trump to contest the case before the trial has begun.
A website for the New York court system shows the appeal was filed Monday and indicates two pending motions for a stay and a change of venue, though the lawsuit itself was not immediately visible. NBC’s source confirmed that the suit was aimed to move the trial and stay the gag order.
Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the appeal.
The appeal was first reported shortly after Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg urged presiding Judge Juan Merchan to reject Trump’s latest request for the judge to recuse himself.
Bragg slammed that bid as a bad-faith effort to delay the trial and sidestep a gag order barring him from speaking about the judge’s daughter.
Trump’s “rewarmed” arguments for New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan’s recusal offer nothing new from a prior attempt to get a new judge, Bragg wrote in a court filing.
Rather, Bragg argued, the current recusal motion is a “last-ditch” bid to postpone the trial that appears “transparently reverse-engineered” to justify Trump’s spate of recent attacks on Merchan’s adult daughter.
It’s “an effort to end-run” the gag order and “pollute the court” with attacks against the judge and his family “as part of a meritless effort to call the integrity of these proceedings into question,” Bragg wrote.
Trump’s lawyers, in court filings Friday, argued that Authentic Campaigns, the Democratic consulting firm where Merchan’s daughter works, stands to benefit from the hush money case by using it to raise money and promote an anti-Trump message.
“Personal political views may not be a basis for recusal. But profiting from the promotion of a political agenda that is hostile to President Trump, and has included fundraising solicitations based on this case, must be,” they wrote.
Bragg, in Monday’s filing, called it “pure speculation to assume that rulings by this Court would affect Authentic’s contracts or revenue.” Even if the company were fundraising off the trial, it still wouldn’t be a sufficient basis for the judge’s recusal, Bragg added.
The filing came days after Merchan expanded a gag order on Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, to prohibit him from making statements about the judge’s family members that could interfere with the case. Merchan also amended the order to bar Trump from speaking about Bragg’s family members.
The strengthened gag order came after Trump sent a spate of social media posts targeting Merchan’s daughter, Loren Merchan, over her political work and claiming it proved the judge was biased.
Trump also accused Loren Merchan of controlling an X account that displayed a photo depicting Trump behind jail cell bars. New York’s court administration office denied that the judge’s daughter controlled that account at the time it posted that picture.
Judge Merchan wrote in the order that people watching Trump’s attacks may conclude that their loved ones may come under fire if they get involved in the case. The situation constitutes “a direct attack on the Rule of Law itself,” he wrote.
The judge last summer had rejected Trump’s first recusal request, which also focused on Loren Merchan’s political activities.
Bragg on Monday argued that Trump’s current recusal motion makes “identical” arguments, adding that the few points it includes that were not previously made are “wholly meritless.”
The hush money case is set to be the first of Trump’s four criminal cases to head to trial. The former president’s lawyers have repeatedly tried to dismiss or delay all of those cases while he runs to unseat Democratic incumbent President Joe Biden.
