Elon Musk says Tesla shareholders are backing his $56bn pay package; markets cling onto soft landing hopes – business live | Business

Musk says Tesla shareholders voting yes for his $56bn pay package

Today is a red letter day for Tesla, which is asking its shareholders to approve a $56bn (£44bn) compensation package for CEO Elon Musk.

The package is up for approval, again, after being thrown out by a Delaware judge earlier this year – which has prompted the electric car manufacturer to also seek investor approval to shift its legal base to Texas.

Tesla has been urging shareholders to back the package – the largest ever granted to an executive at a US-listed company – with chair Robyn Denholm warning that Musk could step back if it was blocked.

Despite that plea, some major shareholders are opposing the package, including Norges Bank Investment Management, and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS). And major proxy firms Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) had urged shareholders to reject the pay package.

Musk, though, has declared this morning that shareholders are voting to approve the package, and the move to Texas, by “wide margins”.

Rolling out the red heart emoji, he posted:

“Thanks for your support!!”

The AGM starts at 9.30pm UK time tonight. Reuters points out that shareholders are allowed to change their vote up to the start of the annual meeting….

The pay package was first agreed by Tesla’s board, and backed by shareholders, in 2018. For Musk to qualify for the money, Tesla had to hit various revenue, profit and share price targets, which were met.

But back in January, Delaware judge Kathaleen McCormick ruled in favor of a Tesla shareholder who argued that the company’s board inappropriately set the pay package. The judge agreed Musk’s pay package was unnecessary in keeping Musk dedicated to Tesla, an argument that company officers made during the trial.

Share

Key events

SpaceX and its chief executive, Elon Musk, were sued on Wednesday by eight engineers who say they were illegally fired for raising concerns about alleged sexual harassment and discrimination against women, their lawyers have said.

Share

The lesson of the Tesla pay packet saga, our financial editor Nils Pratley wrote this week, is that being a director of a listed company involves more than being a cheerleader in the Elon Musk fan club.

Nils explains:

But before this saga slips out of the headlines, there is the small matter of what the Delaware judge, Kathaleen McCormick, actually said in her 200-page judgment in January. Read the whole thing and the board of Tesla in 2018 comes across as a collection of patsies who were so in thrall to the boss that they were incapable of running even a semi-robust process for setting his incentives.

Nobody disputes that Tesla’s share price had to perform a minor miracle to deliver Musk’s prize in full: from a valuation of $50bn-ish, the requirement was to get above $650bn by 2028 (which actually happened in just three years). Rather, the problem was the people Tesla put in charge of negotiating with Musk to determine a fair jackpot.

As the judge noted, Ira Ehrenpreis, the lead director, had a 15-year business relationship with Musk. Another member of the working group, Antonio Gracias, went on holiday with Musk’s family. A third was Todd Maron, Musk’s former divorce attorney and the company’s general counsel, “whose admiration for Musk moved him to tears during his deposition”.

McCormick concluded that the process behind the award was “deeply flawed” and the terms “not entirely fair” to all shareholders: in essence, Musk said what he wanted and received minimal push-back.

Share

Should Tesla pay Elon Musk $45bn? The shareholders will decide

Even if Tesla’s shareholders do approve Musk’s mega pay deal, the company also needs to persuade an already skeptical Delaware judge to recognize it.

My colleague Nick Robins-Early explains:

However, it is unclear if a court that blocked the deal will accept the re-vote, which is not binding, and allow the company to restore the pay package and move its HQ.

A Delaware chancery court judge nullified Musk’s pay package in January. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick ruled that the board’s process of reaching the dollar figure, which she called “unfathomable”, was illegitimate and that Musk’s ties with board members were too extensive for them to be considered independent.

Share

Musk says Tesla shareholders voting yes for his $56bn pay package

Today is a red letter day for Tesla, which is asking its shareholders to approve a $56bn (£44bn) compensation package for CEO Elon Musk.

The package is up for approval, again, after being thrown out by a Delaware judge earlier this year – which has prompted the electric car manufacturer to also seek investor approval to shift its legal base to Texas.

Tesla has been urging shareholders to back the package – the largest ever granted to an executive at a US-listed company – with chair Robyn Denholm warning that Musk could step back if it was blocked.

Despite that plea, some major shareholders are opposing the package, including Norges Bank Investment Management, and the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS). And major proxy firms Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) had urged shareholders to reject the pay package.

Musk, though, has declared this morning that shareholders are voting to approve the package, and the move to Texas, by “wide margins”.

Rolling out the red heart emoji, he posted:

“Thanks for your support!!”

The AGM starts at 9.30pm UK time tonight. Reuters points out that shareholders are allowed to change their vote up to the start of the annual meeting….

The pay package was first agreed by Tesla’s board, and backed by shareholders, in 2018. For Musk to qualify for the money, Tesla had to hit various revenue, profit and share price targets, which were met.

But back in January, Delaware judge Kathaleen McCormick ruled in favor of a Tesla shareholder who argued that the company’s board inappropriately set the pay package. The judge agreed Musk’s pay package was unnecessary in keeping Musk dedicated to Tesla, an argument that company officers made during the trial.

Share

Introduction: Soft landing hopes alive after Fed meeting

Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets, and the world economy.

Financial markets are clinging onto hopes of a soft landing after the world’s most powerful central banker hailed a fall in US inflation.

Under a soft landing, central bankers tame inflation and eventually cut interest rates while avoiding a recession. Sticky price pressures in the US have made this scenario seem less likely, as we’ve moved through 2024.

But investors are cheered by yesterday’s data showing that US consumer price inflation weakened to 3.3% in May, along with a fall in underlying inflation.

Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell bolstered that optimism, telling reporters last night that it was “certainly a better inflation report than almost anybody expected.”

Powell was speaking after the Fed left US interest rates on hold, at a two-decade high.

And its latest dot plots showed that Fed officials now expect just one interest rate cut this year, down from three forecast in March. They also expect inflation to be more stubborn this year than they thought in the spring.

Fed’s Dot Plot:

Projection for just one US rate cut this year despite a very tame CPI reading.

However, the Fed Chair said that many officials were on the fence over a second rate cut, and had just tacked an extra one onto 2025. pic.twitter.com/TTqz6MX5BN

— PowerPoint Guy (@Adi_183) June 13, 2024

But Powell also hinted that the Fed is ready to cut rates if inflation falls quickly, or if the economy weakened, saying:

“If the labor market were to weaken unexpectedly or inflation were to fall more quickly than anticipated, we are prepared to respond.”

This lifted stocks on Wall Street, where the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite closed at record highs for a third straight session.

Traders are encouraged that the Fed doesn’t see a big slowdown on the horizon, and sanguine that this may mean fewer rate cuts than hoped this year. After all, the Fed now sees an extra rate cut in 2025.

So while the landing may be delayed, it may not be too bumpy.

Analysts at ING say the Fed wants to see three things: More evidence of inflation pressures easing, more evidence of labour market slack, and softening consumer spending.

They add:

If we get all three of these, we believe the Fed will indeed seek to move monetary policy from “restrictive” to “slightly less restrictive” with 25bp rate cuts at the September, November and December FOMC meetings.

Also coming up today

Leaders from the G7 are meeting in Borgo Egnazia in the southern region of Puglia, where they’re expected to approve a plan to use the interest from frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine

The latest index of US producer prices will test the soft landing narrative, with economists predicting a slowdown in price rises in May.

The agenda

  • 9.30pm BST: Tesla AGM, where shareholders will vote on Elon Musk’s$56bn pay deal

  • 1.30pm BST: PPI index of US producer prices

  • 1.30pm BST: US weekly initial jobless claims

  • 2pm BST: Russia’s trade balance for April

Share

Source link

Denial of responsibility! NewsConcerns is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment