Alan Eugene Miller: Alabama pauses controversial execution at the last minute


The execution by lethal injection of Alan Eugene Miller by the state of Alabama has been halted after the inmate’s veins couldn’t be accessed within protocol time restrictions.

“Due to the time constraints resulting in the lateness of the court proceedings, the execution was called off once it was determined the condemned’s veins could not be accessed in accordance with our protocol before the expiration of the death warrant,” John Hamm, the Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, told the press, according to

Miller was sentenced to death after a shooting in Shelby County on 5 August 1999 that lead to the deaths of three men.

His execution was halted at around 11.30pm on Thursday night. The state’s death warrant expired at midnight.

The 57-year-old was sent back to his cell on death row.

Officials escort murder suspect Alan Eugene Miller away from the Pelham City Jail in Ala., on Aug. 5, 1999


Mr Hamm said the families of the victims in the shooting had been made aware of the execution halt.

Shortly after 9pm, the US Supreme Court ruled that the state of Alabama had almost three hours to carry out the execution before the expiration of the death warrant.

According to Mr Hamm, the staff began trying to determine the outline of Miller’s veins to administer the lethal injection, but the commissioner said he was unsure how much time the staff spent attempting to find a vein.

“I’m not sure… I wasn’t looking at that. We were more focused on the time that the court, the Supreme Court, sent their order. Before we start accessing veins, we have other things we have to do that take time,” Mr Hamm said, according to

“There are several things that we have to do before we even start accessing the veins. And that was taking a little bit longer than we anticipated,” he added when pressed by the members of the media.

Alabama’s Republican Governor Kay Ivey said in a statement that “in Alabama, we are committed to law and order and upholding justice. Despite the circumstances that led to the cancellation of this execution, nothing will change the fact that a jury heard the evidence of this case and made a decision”.

“It does not change the fact that Mr Miller never disputed his crimes. And it does not change the fact that three families still grieve,” she added. “We all know full well that Michael Holdbrooks, Terry Lee Jarvis and Christopher Scott Yancey did not choose to die by bullets to the chest. Tonight, my prayers are with the victims’ families and loved ones as they are forced to continue reliving the pain of their loss.”

A spokesperson for the governor said she “anticipates that the execution will be reset at the earliest opportunity”.

The shootings Miller was convicted of took place at two workplaces, at his then-current job and a previous one. Mr Holdbrooks and Mr Yancy, 32 and 28 years old respectively, were killed at Ferguson Enterprises, and Mr Jarvis, 39, was killed at Post Airgas in Pelham.

Members of the press were taken to the William C Holman Correctional Facility for the execution at 10.34pm and went back to the media centre just before midnight, reported.

In several filings on Thursday, the Alabama Attorney General’s Office requested that the Supreme Court overturn a lower court ruling that in effect stayed the proceeding.

The Supreme Court granted the application to vacate the injunction at around 9.08pm on Thursday night.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson voted to block the execution. The court didn’t issue an opinion.

Miller claims that he completed a form in June 2018 given to death row inmates at the prison, on which he selected the option to die nitrogen hypoxia – a recently approved method of execution in the state – instead of lethal injection.

The office of the Alabama Attorney General argued that there’s no record of that form being sent in, and that the lethal injection proceeding should go ahead.

On Monday, a federal judge said that “Miller has presented consistent, credible, and uncontroverted direct evidence that he submitted an election form in the manner he says was announced to him by the [Alabama Department of Corrections]”. The judge added that there’s “circumstantial evidence” that the department lost or misplaced the form after Miller submitted it, reported.

“After carefully reviewing hundreds of pages of evidence, weighing live in-court testimony, and sifting through nearly half-a-dozen deposition transcripts, the district court found as a matter of fact that Miller likely elected execution by nitrogen hypoxia in the time provided by Alabama law,” Miller’s attorney’s said in a briefing to the Supreme Court. “The district court entered a preliminary injunction preventing the State from executing Mr Miller by any method other than nitrogen hypoxia, which is precisely what the State has agreed it must do for every other inmate who timely elected nitrogen hypoxia.”

The lawyers said there was no reason that Miller should be executed on Thursday, pushing back on the state for asking the top US court for an order “on an emergency basis”.

“What is the emergency? The State of Alabama wants to proceed with the execution of Alan Miller by lethal injection tonight,” the lawyers wrote. “Mr Miller is not going anywhere, and neither is the Alabama Department of Corrections. The State is manufacturing an emergency need to execute Mr Miller despite the fact that the State can execute Mr Miller once it finalizes its nitrogen hypoxia execution protocol.”

More follows…

Source link

Denial of responsibility! NewsConcerns is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a comment